What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 17:33
/ \ and ⁄ / | \
a b i 1 x []
i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …
First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as
Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.
+ for
Why are Indians so influenced by the Western culture, when the Indian tradition has so much to give?
plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])
It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.
These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.
NASA’s Curiosity Just Parked on Mars—And Made an Unprecedented Discovery - The Daily Galaxy
in structures, such as:
A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:
Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is now available for purchase in the US - GSMArena.com news - GSMArena.com
Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.
NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!